Showing posts with label serpo. Show all posts
Showing posts with label serpo. Show all posts

Saturday, September 13, 2008

Actual Hoverboard And Real Flying Car

I recently added a post to an idea submission site called "www.whynot.net", of how a Hover board may be possible using ion wind technology, follow the ion wind link for wikipedia on the subject.
The following is the post that I submitted:

I recently saw on the show Mythbusters on their "anti-gravity episode" that they used a technology called a "lifter" which was able to float in the air by means of an ionic wind(NOT Antigravity). Also I recently heard about a solid state fan that uses the same ion wind technology, and which can also outperform regular fans in weight and power. So theoretically if you were able to somehow get enough lifting energy from ion wind then you could make either a toy car that floated around on ion wind, or you could make a full sized hover board. But in fact if enough power was possible someday you may even have a rocket pack version, to get from place to place in the future. The draw backs of this technology are:(1)It may not have enough power to lift a person in a compact device.(2)It uses very high voltages(20,000V's). (3)It has a bi-product of Ozone gas from the corona discharge used to make the ion wind. Also you'd need to have DC to DC step up voltage circuit that some technical people might know, which is also in a portable unit along with the battery. But also stabilizing the platform has to be worked out, in some kind of self stabilizing arrangement of electro-aerodynamic pumping.

artZ, Sep 12 2008

Other useful info is to search solid state fan, and electro-aerodynamic pumping. I also theorize that with high enough energy you could make a full sized vehicle float a few inches above the ground.

But if you wanted the vehicle to fly it would be a different technique. If the top of the vehicle was the sharp emitter electrode and the body of the craft was the blunt collector electrode the ion wind would be forced to travel downward around the craft, or from top to bottom, creating upward lift, using the "coanda effect". Here's a link that explains the coanda effect and the theory of flight better through actual simple experimentation. But in short when air is pulled downward to travel along the surface of the craft, by the flow of ions, the equal and opposite reaction of pulling air down also pulls the body of the craft up. The actual shape of the craft is only important for horizontal aerodymanic flight and has nothing to do with lift force. So the only lift force is from the coanda effect created by the ion wind which was itself created by a very powerful DC electrical generator, inside of the craft.
The following is from wikipedia under corona discharge:
Corona discharge usually involves two asymmetric electrodes; one highly curved (such as the tip of a needle, or a small diameter wire) and one of low curvature (such as a plate, or the ground). The high curvature ensures a high potential gradient around one electrode, for the generation of a plasma.

Moving the craft side to side is a different matter though. Which I don't have a solid theory for yet. But it may use the same ion wind technology, with highly charged movable capacitors located inside the craft. Used to offset the charge on one side of the craft making the air flow alter, or reconfigure around that spot, on that side, which would make that side move forward from a change in ion wind flow around it creating a pressure differential. But no solid math that works for that theory yet.

Also the source of power needs to be large which we currently don't have the energy technology for yet other than nuclear. It may be possible to have high voltage Alternating Current also, but because of the alternation it would only have pulses of ion flow. This may be useful if it is true that at high enough frequencies(20,000hertz or above) current then cannot flow through the human body, because of the human body acting as a resistor at that high of a frequency.

But also on the problem of high energies being dangerous to humans, as long as you're suspended in the air and your body doesn't touch the ground then your body won't conduct the energy to the ground and therefor no electric shock. The power line maintenance crews know this trick, and use it all the time(See: "High voltage" under "power lines", on wiki). So always jump onto highly charged objects to not be touching the ground at the same time as you're touching the charged vehicle or object.

Also in making the craft one solid seemless peice of metal for no moving parts or chance of breaking and also for aerodynamics, you would still need some way of entry into the craft. Superfluidity to go straight through the walls of the craft would work, but has never been substantiated as a real technology yet. But suposedly high enough electrical charge mimics the same properties of a plasma(high amount of electrons) and maybe even superfluidity as well. It's just an unsubstantiated hypothesis at this point though.

I do know that at high enough voltages though you get an effect that mimics superconductivity, with very low electrical loss. Because at high voltages the electrons have high potential energy and are static charges and therefore since they are non-moving electrons they have less wire to run into and get resistance from. But then of course it may be releasing that stored energy in the form of photons from the ambient glow that high voltages naturally create. By the way that's how you light the inside of the craft, in order to never have to replace lightbulbs. I call this effect "spontaneous emission".

I used to think that high (+/-)static charges were the same as gravity and anti-gravity, because they both share so many similar characteristics, but now that I have the above verifiable theory, I no longer think that anti-gravity is involved with UFO's, and instead think that it is ion wind. But for space travel they have to use something different, which I no longer have a good theory for. Even though static electricity still shares most of the same physical properties as gravity. There's just no solid evidence or theory for anti-gravity yet. So for now it anti-gravity is still an unsubstantiated hypothesis for space flight.

The only substantiated UFO picture that I've ever heard of is the one that was on the cover of time magazine in the 50's and still cannot be disproved or disputed. It was called the mcminnville photos, so that is the design of craft that I got this theory from. Also on wiki.


Tuesday, March 18, 2008

How All Of The Zeta Reticuli, Project Serpo Technology Works

All of this information is only speculation and is not fact. It is only an attempt on my part, based on my own understanding of science and some creative thinking, to explain how the project Serpo devices would function, using our known laws of physics. None of these ideas are even testable. But I only wrote these ideas on the Project Serpo technology as a starting point to further scientific advancement. Not as the final word on the subject. Hopefully these ideas are inspiring to other creative thinkers. And what is now only purely hypothetical, may eventually be turned into a testable theory.
Follow the links:

Monday, August 13, 2007

More: Super Communicator : UPDATED 3 TIMES

AKA:low signal loss(frictionless) communicator
High voltage effect:

Use the Equation: WATT/AMP=VOLT
If you measure the AMPS in a cross section of the thick part of wire and compare it with the AMPS in the cross section of the thin part of wire. Then you will find that in the thin part of wire there is a HIGHER AMPS PER /WIDTH OF CONDUCTOR which will induce lower VOLTAGE to maintain the same WATTAGE. And in turn the lOWER AMPERAGE PER/ WIDTH OF CONDUCTOR of the thick part of wire you will have a higher VOLTAGE induced to maintain the same WATTAGE along the width of the wire.
So along the length of the wire there is no voltage change but along the width if the wire there is. And the electromagnetic flux produced reflects that fact.
LATER ADDED: Instead of alternating current this is an alternating voltage circuit. Which may or may not be able to transmit a carrier wave just as well as an AC carrier wave.
Super high frequency effect: As electrons pass by each bulge in the wire, in a row, the electrons across the bulge produce a high voltage electromagnetic wave and then the electron moves forward to the next bulge in the wire, and produces a second high voltage wave in the series, and you are effectively making an ultra high frequency radio wave which is probably even higher than the frequency of light. But the high voltage is what makes the low attenuation possible(voltage being the force behind the signal).LATER ADDED: To amend this paragraph, different frequencies go through different substances with different levels of attenuation. And I am not sure if high voltage even has an effect on the attenuation of the signal.
Frequency cancellation effect: When the peaks and valleys of a separate frequency than the frequency of the wire bulges, enters the wire, the peak of that frequency will induce a current on the first bulge, but because it isn't the same frequency as the wire bulges, an opposite polarity will be induced on the next bulge before the current from the first bulge reaches the next bulge. And the valleys of the signal frequency will cancel itself out by 2 opposing currents equaling zero current. Instead of adding to the signal strength on the next bulge, which only the correct frequency can do.
Also: You may need a diode in the wire for one direction of current flow, and as a high frequency filter(or RC constant) . But it may or may not be needed, because your ear can't hear that high of a frequency anyway.
---------------------------------
I was recently informed by Roy that the voltage along a wire is determined by the resistance or the current , so the voltage is constant along the wire. And you cannot increase the voltage along the wire. And I agree. But I say that a thickening of a wire will cause the electromagnetic flux's voltage to be boosted, so that along the wire the voltage is the same but cutting across the thickness of the wire the voltage would be boosted. Meaning higher voltage radio signals even though the circuit's voltage, itself, remains unchanged along the length of the wire.
This is the same principle that transformers use, but they use large coils wound around an iron core. But the new thick wire transformer uses the same amount of copper as a spool of wire does, except you don't have to wind it and it's easier to make a secondary circuit,only meaning that now you have a high voltage low amperage electromagnetic flux radio signal, instead of the high amperage version of using a conventional copper spool around a core.
The only problem that needs to be addressed is that the signal out of the thick wire would be extremely weak even if it was a zero loss signal. So some how you need to either send it at higher wattage or boost it to higher wattage when you receive it to make an audible sound in your communicator. But if you found a way to have a powerful signal without the use of a battery that would be the best case scenario.
Later added: To boost the signal strength in order for the signal to travel farther and also for the sound to be louder on the receiving end, just have a longer spool of "bumpy wire"(wire that is variably thick and thin in diameter, along it's length, at set intervals, for a set frequency). This in effect would be the same as having a bigger antenna. Or how they make radios without batteries by just having a long spool of wire as the antenna and also power supply
I heard once that at high frequencies the body acts as a resistor to the flow of electricity and so cannot get shocked no matter how high the amperage and voltage. This may or may not be a fact, but if it is a proven fact, and is true for electricity, would it be also true for electromagnetic waves at high frequency? Because if the opposite is true of there being no resistance at high frequencies of radio waves, zero attenuation signal transmission.
(LATER ADDED): Sort of in the same way as how 2 air particles split in 2 directions as they flow around a wing but they both enter at the same time and must also exit at the same time. Which means that if you have spread out particles on the top half of wing then you have lower pressure on that side.
(SIDE NOTE)The Equation of flight: Time/ Distance=Air pressure
Where Time: is the particles must end at the same exact place that they began after passing the wing
Where Distance: That the particles travel is determined by the shape of the wing
Where air pressure: Is the lifting force of the wing.