Wallington's Stonehenge

Wally Wallington
The “Wallington lever”
This is a good way to make your own megalithic stone structures to use as a house or just for fun.

Here are some links to the video and his site, and other info:
http://www.mlive.com/flintjournal/index.ssf/2008/02/local_mans_stonehenge_technolo.html
The above is a good video of the Wallington method in practice.
http://www.theforgottentechnology.com/
The above is his official website.
http://physicsbuzz.physicscentral.com/2007/11/instant-stonehenge-just-add-physics.html
The above is a short delve into the physics at work in large object moving method.
http://www.gizapyramid.com/wallington.htm
The above has some extra pictures not seen elsewhere.



He has pivot points but I don’t know how he gets the rock pivots under the large block especially as he’s still moving the block. Because I would assume that one person would have to tilt the large block to one side while he puts a pivot stone under the other side of the huge block.

Or maybe he puts the stones into the correct position in the middle of the 180 degree turn and while he’s placing the stone pivot where he wants it, the huge block is resting on the ground halfway into the turn, and then he completes the full 180 degree turn and rests the stone exactly on the new pivot point, as long as he has calculated the exact placement of the pivot stone for the notch in the big block to rest on perfectly. Therefore he just keeps reusing the same 2 pivot stones.

I need to also research cutting out stone. I think if you have a harder material used as a chisel against a rock that is a softer material, then you can cut the softer stone with that chisel. Or just use a metal chisel. Also you need a mallet and a wedge to cleave of large chunks of rock. After chipping out holes to put the wedge in. Rocks always want to fracture along there grain, or along weak points that have been artificially chiseled into them. In the same way as you make perforated paper. You drill holes along where you want it to fracture.

And I figured out how the stones in the pyramid and also Machu Picchu were so exactly placed together so that even a piece of paper won't fit between them. In Machu Picchu, their stones were of many different shapes and sizes even at crooked angles so I theorize their method was to fracture the stones off of an original stone outcrop like disassembling a puzzle, and then reassemble those pieces back into the way that they were taken out along their same fracture lines. But for the pyramids what they may have done is hammer the tops of the stones to flatten them out or may have even sanded them.

Obviously none of this requires alien technology to accomplish. I'm going to have to try it one day.

The Final Revolution Is...

The only things written below that are fact, are what is written in bold lettering, and can be easily referenced on "Wikipedia".

The Antimatter revolution. Once we can create antimatter or any other source of energy just as powerful and perfect as antimatter, then we will have the ability to make any kind of material with any property that we can imagine. Transparent aluminum. Structures of any material that are harder than diamonds. Or we will be able to just pass straight through walls. Which is called super fluidity.

And with super fluidity, you can partially pass one object partially through another object and then take away the super fluidity charge, and what you are left with is a solid joint between 2 objects that is the strongest joint that you can possibly make, and all without the need for tools.

Other than super fluidity we will have super conduction at room temperature, which intern creates perpetual motion motors that never loose energy within their circuit. But they keep outpouring mechanical energy. I could prove to the world today that you can make a perpetual motion machine in the outer solar system because the extremely low temperature allow natural superconductors which could run a motor indefinitely, with net gain of energy. Ruining the patent offices stance on perpetual motion machines being impossible.

We will also have super strength materials. And also super tenacity materials.

Materials all can emit light at these high energies, the same way that lightning bolts and static electricity emit light, making it possible for walls to emit light, as long as the energy source never fails. This is instead of using conventional light fixtures that can break.

We will be able to produce artificial gravity and artificial anti-gravity, based on gravity being one and the same as static electricity. Which itself entails gravity plates, and tractor beams made of gravity fields, and gravity propulsion made out of extremely powerful capacitor banks.

We will also be able to manipulate the speed at which time flows. Because time is relative. And as Einstien explained, at high speeds(a form of energy) time slows down for the moving object, relative to the outside rate of time. And if it is possible to slow time down one way, and there are always more that one way of doing the same thing in this universe, then I theorize that other types of high energies, can also effect the rate of time. Namely by using high electric fields to effect the rate of time on a charged object. And that entails that you may be able to travel for hundreds of years in space and have it only seem like 1 year inside of the space craft. But then of course you'd arrive back at your planet and your friends would have aged 100 years against your 1 year.

For space travel you just need to distort time and space and material properties with high energy fields that never fail(as in superconductors), and then you will be able to travel through celestial objects that are in your path of travel, unscathed. Such as asteroids. This is due to your ship having the properties of a super fluid and as you approach an object you will impart your charge onto it making it a super fluid as well, as you touch it, therefore passing through it. And if that doesn't work then have an ion beam that imparts a charge onto an approaching object which would make it a super fluid. Maybe super fluidity is partly the same effect as how high voltage electricity can pass through any material also. Just off setting the atomic charge that says an atom is solid.

These are not the only technologies that will be discovered though. There are also lots of other technologies that don't use super high energies that will also be extremely useful in the future. Such as medical technology where we will be able to live indefinitely, and machining technology, and radio frequency technology, which can stall car engines, and can kill specific types of cells or infections in the body, and can send signals through any substance without attenuation, and computer/robot/artificial intelligence technology, and other unknown sciences yet to be discovered.

Also these high energies may not be easy to use on earth because of electric arcing making you loose your charge. But space is alternately the perfect place for these high energies to not dissipate and for gravity to not be an influence. And for you to make a perfectly comfortable and indefinitely lasting habitat.


The facts supporting the above theories are:

• The only thing giving substances their properties is the electron charge ratio of the atom, with less of a charge or more of a charge it can connect with other materials and with a balanced charge it is inert. But if you give the atom a high enough voltage that offsets the atomic charge, does it become a super fluid in the same way as electrons do at high voltages? And are atomic bonds just a form of partial super fluidic welding of two materials together?
  
• Electricity can be transformed into Cooling or Heating in multiple ways. Namely in thermo electric effect, compressors, electrical resistance.
  
• At high enough voltages electrons can pass through any substance easier. This is fact, the following is not. But at extremely high voltages you may get superconductivity where there is no energy loss within the wire. If this happens then you may be able to make a super conducting magnetic motor that keeps pumping out more mechanical energy than electrical energy dissipation, and the super conduction cycles the motors energy indefinitely. Which is good for perfect autonomous space travel power generation. Theoretically this is how the "alien grey's" spaceship technology works, which is a separate kind of technology than what the project Serpo aliens use.
• Antimatter has a negative electric charge, which makes it the highest stored amount of energy known. This is fact, the following is not. And if you can harness antimatter's potential energy, it can offset any of the positive charge of this universe. Which means nullifying all of the physical laws of any material to you own personal choosing. In the same way as nullifying the effects of a substances is possible by balancing their electrical charge. Like how nitrogen is inert, under the usual balanced charge circumstances.
  
• Static charge emits light.
• High gravity objects emit heat. This is fact, the following is not.This is my theory of spontaneous emission. When dense enough atomic charges, like in the center of planets are present, you get emission of infra red light particles spontaneously. Gravity may have the side effect of infra red radiation only because of the "energy density" of the center of the planet creating spontaneous emission of the infra red wavelength or higher in the same way as high energy density of static electricity emits its own light. Which would infer that all earth like planets and larger should always be volcanic forever, and smaller ones may only sometimes be volcanic from tectonic stresses alone. And it may explain why Jupiter emits heat radiation even though it doesn't emit visible light.
  
• Einsteins theory that there is time dilation when the speed of an object increases, which has since been proven by the atomic clock on a plane experiment. Cross referenced with an atomic clock on the ground.
  
• Relativity: I explained in the same that we explain freeze drying food. Under certain conditions the ice in the food does not turn into a liquid but instead turns into a gas immediately. Which is called sublimation, and only occurs at relative air pressures. This is what I find somewhat analogous to my theory of materials portraying completely new properties of any kind, under certain relatively high energy conditions.
  

More: Super Communicator : UPDATED 3 TIMES

AKA:low signal loss(frictionless) communicator
High voltage effect:
Use the Equation: WATT/AMP=VOLT
If you measure the AMPS in a cross section of the thick part of wire and compare it with the AMPS in the cross section of the thin part of wire. Then you will find that in the thin part of wire there is a HIGHER AMPS PER /WIDTH OF CONDUCTOR which will induce lower VOLTAGE to maintain the same WATTAGE. And in turn the lOWER AMPERAGE PER/ WIDTH OF CONDUCTOR of the thick part of wire you will have a higher VOLTAGE induced to maintain the same WATTAGE along the width of the wire.
So along the length of the wire there is no voltage change but along the width if the wire there is. And the electromagnetic flux produced reflects that fact.
LATER ADDED: Instead of alternating current this is an alternating voltage circuit. Which may or may not be able to transmit a carrier wave just as well as an AC carrier wave.
Super high frequency effect: As electrons pass by each bulge in the wire, in a row, the electrons across the bulge produce a high voltage electromagnetic wave and then the electron moves forward to the next bulge in the wire, and produces a second high voltage wave in the series, and you are effectively making an ultra high frequency radio wave which is probably even higher than the frequency of light. But the high voltage is what makes the low attenuation possible(voltage being the force behind the signal).LATER ADDED: To amend this paragraph, different frequencies go through different substances with different levels of attenuation. And I am not sure if high voltage even has an effect on the attenuation of the signal.
Frequency cancellation effect: When the peaks and valleys of a separate frequency than the frequency of the wire bulges, enters the wire, the peak of that frequency will induce a current on the first bulge, but because it isn't the same frequency as the wire bulges, an opposite polarity will be induced on the next bulge before the current from the first bulge reaches the next bulge. And the valleys of the signal frequency will cancel itself out by 2 opposing currents equaling zero current. Instead of adding to the signal strength on the next bulge, which only the correct frequency can do.
Also: You may need a diode in the wire for one direction of current flow, and as a high frequency filter(or RC constant) . But it may or may not be needed, because your ear can't hear that high of a frequency anyway.
---------------------------------
I was recently informed by Roy that the voltage along a wire is determined by the resistance or the current , so the voltage is constant along the wire. And you cannot increase the voltage along the wire. And I agree. But I say that a thickening of a wire will cause the electromagnetic flux's voltage to be boosted, so that along the wire the voltage is the same but cutting across the thickness of the wire the voltage would be boosted. Meaning higher voltage radio signals even though the circuit's voltage, itself, remains unchanged along the length of the wire.
This is the same principle that transformers use, but they use large coils wound around an iron core. But the new thick wire transformer uses the same amount of copper as a spool of wire does, except you don't have to wind it and it's easier to make a secondary circuit,only meaning that now you have a high voltage low amperage electromagnetic flux radio signal, instead of the high amperage version of using a conventional copper spool around a core.
The only problem that needs to be addressed is that the signal out of the thick wire would be extremely weak even if it was a zero loss signal. So some how you need to either send it at higher wattage or boost it to higher wattage when you receive it to make an audible sound in your communicator. But if you found a way to have a powerful signal without the use of a battery that would be the best case scenario.
Later added: To boost the signal strength in order for the signal to travel farther and also for the sound to be louder on the receiving end, just have a longer spool of "bumpy wire"(wire that is variably thick and thin in diameter, along it's length, at set intervals, for a set frequency). This in effect would be the same as having a bigger antenna. Or how they make radios without batteries by just having a long spool of wire as the antenna and also power supply
I heard once that at high frequencies the body acts as a resistor to the flow of electricity and so cannot get shocked no matter how high the amperage and voltage. This may or may not be a fact, but if it is a proven fact, and is true for electricity, would it be also true for electromagnetic waves at high frequency? Because if the opposite is true of there being no resistance at high frequencies of radio waves, zero attenuation signal transmission.
(LATER ADDED): Sort of in the same way as how 2 air particles split in 2 directions as they flow around a wing but they both enter at the same time and must also exit at the same time. Which means that if you have spread out particles on the top half of wing then you have lower pressure on that side.
(SIDE NOTE)The Equation of flight: Time/ Distance=Air pressure
Where Time: is the particles must end at the same exact place that they began after passing the wing
Where Distance: That the particles travel is determined by the shape of the wing
Where air pressure: Is the lifting force of the wing.