Vortex Tube And Pulse Jet

I ran across this article while researching something else on wikipedia. It was about Vortex tubes. Then I thought "How can I get one of these". So I put that into the "search all categories" of Ebay. And there it was. Also I found a link to a cheaper place to buy them at the bottom of that ebay page.
This invention may have room to be improved upon, seeing as how they may not understand 100% of the physics behind it yet. The main questions being, how do you improve efficiency compared with ordinary A/C, and why doesn't it work as well on liquids, as on gasses?
My very first theory on this is that the more energetic less dense and therefor lighter hot air can more easily escape the center of the vortex(heat rises). One way of testing this could be by putting two dissimilar gasses into the vortex and seeing if the heavier gas comes out on the cold side.
Another application of this technology, may be to separate dissimilar gasses without the need to liquefy the gasses to separate them, like they do to manufacture pure nitrogen and oxygen.
Even if you can still create cryogenic temperatures with vortex tubes in series.
But they make noise so just have a muffler type thing on one end to not have noise if wanted to use it in a house. But if you wanted a house cooling system you should use the new" Johnson thermo-electrochemical converter system".
If you put compressed hydrogen into it at the right pressure it would come out as a flame thrower.
Youtube vortex tube

Also see: Pulse jet engine, or Youtube pulse jet, This is so cool that it's funny. See: Mythbusters for finding cool things funny.

Also see: Tesla turbine, or youtube it, if you haven't heard of it yet. This uses the principle of the "coanda effect". Which is also why wind over the top of a chimney will suck air out of the chimney.

Also see: Venturi effect, which is utilized in pulse jets. youtube it for some more visual explanations. This is also called Bernoulli's principle. I think all of these and the theory of flight are more easilly understood by all being seen as variations of the "Coanda effect". Because if a wing was shaped like the cross section of a frisby it wouldn't fly, and Bernoulli's principle says it would fly. See this link for a very good explaination of the theory of flight.
Bernoulli's principle is easilly remembered as: Faster moving air has lower air pressure.
The way a chimney works is also explained better by the coanda effect than bernoulli's principle, because if air in the chimney is attracted to air from a breeze above the chimney then the air in the chimney will be impelled to move in along with the moving air above the chimney from the inherent attractive forces. So the kinetic energy of the moving air is imparted into the chimney's air forcing the chimney air to move in the same direction, from the coanda effects force of attraction. This is the same with all of the ball and wind tests, and the 2 can test. All being explained better by the "Coanda effect".

Prank: Use bernoulli's principle or the coanda effect to TP someones house in seconds with the use of a leaf blower. See video.

Also see: Dredging, or Suction dredge often used in gold mining, which uses a solid state "y shaped" joint and the principle of suction. This is the same as how chimneys work but more specialized Y shape for dredging specific purposes.

The following picture is an improved wind turbine design.

Later added: I now am pretty sure that the coanda effect and van der waals forces are the same effect in different forms. I presume that fluids like air are attracted to solid surfaces(because solid surfaces electromagnetic charge is constantly pointed in one direction to attract free flowing fluids opposing charges) by electromagnetic forces at the atomic level in the same way as gecko skin is attracted to any solid surface. So in theory the "Coanda effect" which better describes the theory of flight than bernouli's principle, is actually an electromagnetic effect at the atomic level that is one and the same as van der waals forces.
Gravity could be an electromagnetic macro scale effect, but there is no solid theory or info supporting a connection yet.

Actual Hoverboard And Real Flying Car

I recently added a post to an idea submission site called "www.whynot.net", of how a Hover board may be possible using ion wind technology, follow the ion wind link for wikipedia on the subject.
The following is the post that I submitted:

I recently saw on the show Mythbusters on their "anti-gravity episode" that they used a technology called a "lifter" which was able to float in the air by means of an ionic wind(NOT Antigravity). Also I recently heard about a solid state fan that uses the same ion wind technology, and which can also outperform regular fans in weight and power. So theoretically if you were able to somehow get enough lifting energy from ion wind then you could make either a toy car that floated around on ion wind, or you could make a full sized hover board. But in fact if enough power was possible someday you may even have a rocket pack version, to get from place to place in the future. The draw backs of this technology are:(1)It may not have enough power to lift a person in a compact device.(2)It uses very high voltages(20,000V's). (3)It has a bi-product of Ozone gas from the corona discharge used to make the ion wind. Also you'd need to have DC to DC step up voltage circuit that some technical people might know, which is also in a portable unit along with the battery. But also stabilizing the platform has to be worked out, in some kind of self stabilizing arrangement of electro-aerodynamic pumping.

artZ, Sep 12 2008

Other useful info is to search solid state fan, and electro-aerodynamic pumping. I also theorize that with high enough energy you could make a full sized vehicle float a few inches above the ground.

But if you wanted the vehicle to fly it would be a different technique. If the top of the vehicle was the sharp emitter electrode and the body of the craft was the blunt collector electrode the ion wind would be forced to travel downward around the craft, or from top to bottom, creating upward lift, using the "coanda effect". Here's a link that explains the coanda effect and the theory of flight better through actual simple experimentation. But in short when air is pulled downward to travel along the surface of the craft, by the flow of ions, the equal and opposite reaction of pulling air down also pulls the body of the craft up. The actual shape of the craft is only important for horizontal aerodymanic flight and has nothing to do with lift force. So the only lift force is from the coanda effect created by the ion wind which was itself created by a very powerful DC electrical generator, inside of the craft.
The following is from wikipedia under corona discharge:

Corona discharge usually involves two asymmetric electrodes; one highly curved (such as the tip of a needle, or a small diameter wire) and one of low curvature (such as a plate, or the ground). The high curvature ensures a high potential gradient around one electrode, for the generation of a plasma.

Moving the craft side to side is a different matter though. Which I don't have a solid theory for yet. But it may use the same ion wind technology, with highly charged movable capacitors located inside the craft. Used to offset the charge on one side of the craft making the air flow alter, or reconfigure around that spot, on that side, which would make that side move forward from a change in ion wind flow around it creating a pressure differential. But no solid math that works for that theory yet.

Also the source of power needs to be large which we currently don't have the energy technology for yet other than nuclear. It may be possible to have high voltage Alternating Current also, but because of the alternation it would only have pulses of ion flow. This may be useful if it is true that at high enough frequencies(20,000hertz or above) current then cannot flow through the human body, because of the human body acting as a resistor at that high of a frequency.

But also on the problem of high energies being dangerous to humans, as long as you're suspended in the air and your body doesn't touch the ground then your body won't conduct the energy to the ground and therefor no electric shock. The power line maintenance crews know this trick, and use it all the time(See: "High voltage" under "power lines", on wiki). So always jump onto highly charged objects to not be touching the ground at the same time as you're touching the charged vehicle or object.

Also in making the craft one solid seemless peice of metal for no moving parts or chance of breaking and also for aerodynamics, you would still need some way of entry into the craft. Superfluidity to go straight through the walls of the craft would work, but has never been substantiated as a real technology yet. But suposedly high enough electrical charge mimics the same properties of a plasma(high amount of electrons) and maybe even superfluidity as well. It's just an unsubstantiated hypothesis at this point though.

I do know that at high enough voltages though you get an effect that mimics superconductivity, with very low electrical loss. Because at high voltages the electrons have high potential energy and are static charges and therefore since they are non-moving electrons they have less wire to run into and get resistance from. But then of course it may be releasing that stored energy in the form of photons from the ambient glow that high voltages naturally create. By the way that's how you light the inside of the craft, in order to never have to replace lightbulbs. I call this effect "spontaneous emission".

I used to think that high (+/-)static charges were the same as gravity and anti-gravity, because they both share so many similar characteristics, but now that I have the above verifiable theory, I no longer think that anti-gravity is involved with UFO's, and instead think that it is ion wind. But for space travel they have to use something different, which I no longer have a good theory for. Even though static electricity still shares most of the same physical properties as gravity. There's just no solid evidence or theory for anti-gravity yet. So for now it anti-gravity is still an unsubstantiated hypothesis for space flight.

The only substantiated UFO picture that I've ever heard of is the one that was on the cover of time magazine in the 50's and still cannot be disproved or disputed. It was called the mcminnville photos, so that is the design of craft that I got this theory from. Also on wiki.

New Cancer Screening Technique (Unfinished Idea)

If I do become a doctor which I now want to do I might see if this idea is worth entertaining.
The problem with cancer screening is first that it has to be cost effective and those forms of screening are usually invasive(breast/prostate) and ineffective for some types of cancer(such as medical imaging of lung cancer legions).
The best way to cure cancer at the moment is to catch it early and to use modern chemotherapy and radiation to kill it. So to catch it early will save a lot of lives.
So me as an inventor, I like to find solutions to a problem.
I was thinking if you used:

Monoclonal antibody therapy is another strategy in which the therapeutic agent is an antibody which specifically binds to a protein on the surface of the cancer cells
-This quoted from wiki under "Cancer"

And combined it with a easily detectable material, which is also very cheaply produced and detected. Then you would give someone the detectable substance which is attached to the antibodies and introduce them into the blood stream. Most likely being a cheap and detectable solid(nano-sized, and sphere shaped) which is then coated with the antibodies, or peptides(also being cheap).
Take the pill filled with this material the night before and in the morning see the doctor and it will have spread throughout the body attaching to anything cancerous. Then you run through the full body scanning machine where it takes a quick picture and gives absolutely positive or absolutely negative results. Then you're done with your check-up.
This would be done maybe once a year for early diagnosis of all kinds of cancer. But may need different types of antibodies for different types of cancer proteins. Which may be a problem if we never find all of the antibody types for all of the types of cancerous proteins. And another problem is of you can't get the antibody particles to the cancer, from maybe blood flow not carrying the particles to that location.
The detector would actually probably be the most complex part of this idea because it has to detect very small anomalies trough the body tissue. maybe if the substance were metal it could be detected with a modified x-ray machine that ignored most organic tissue such as bones.
But Both the type of detector and the type of material to be detected are still up in the air.


Also research: Jellyfish green fluorescent proteins combined into a mammals DNA to make the animals skin luminescent under ultraviolet light.(It works also)
Also research: The new technique that uses the same metal particles surrounded by antibodies, but instead uses microwaves to then kill the cancer cells. And is now supposedly doing animal trials. Called the "Kanzius machine"
But in the end the ealier you get to the cancer the better no matter what the treatment. Also it's always less invasive for smaller tumors.

Gypsum, Limestone, and Soil

Gypsum when heated to 150 °C becomes calcium sulfate hemihydrate,
Then this material is called "Plaster of Paris", and when mixed with water it reforms into Gypsum.

Limestone(A.K.A. Calcium carbonate)when heated to 825°C becomes calcium oxide(A.K.A. Burnt lime, or Quick lime) this new material is called cement, and when mixed with water and carbon dioxide turns back into calcium carbonate, or limestone.

Soil is composed of Sand, Silt, and Clay. Sand is the largest sized particle contained in soil, Silt is the second largest sized particle contained in soil, and clay is the smallest sized particle contained in soil. Clay and Sand when mixed together with water in a ratio of about 30% clay and 70% sand, and are allowed to dry are now known as the material "Stucco".

When these 3 materials are mixed together along with clay minerals you now have what is call "Portland Cement" which is comprised of ( concrete, mortar, stucco ) and add water this new mix is stronger than the previous individual materials by themselves. But there is a special technique to producing Portland cement, and a special ratio of each component substance.

Chain Reactions

The above picture depicts what occurs when a lightning bolt is created. I just learned this on an Annenburg CPB show called the "Mechanical Universe".
Why I find this interesting is that it is a cascade reaction. Which is the same kind of reaction that lasers use, and the same kind of reaction that atomic bombs use, and is the same kind of reaction that some chemical reactions use, and also it's the same kind of reaction as avalanches.
It is potential energy that is released all at once in a chain reaction.
This is not exactly free energy because the charges have to be built up ahead of time before the particles react in this way.
This is totally separate from perpetual motion devices or free energy devices. "Perpetual motion" as a term is misleading because the planets rotate around the sun in perpetual motion already. But free energy is the term I like to use for machines that produce more energy or work than is put into them.
With todays technology, these types of free energy machines may be possible in the outer solar system. The reasoning is that it is cold enough for superconductors out there to work constantly, which means that you can have a continuous energy loop with zero loss of charge.
This may or may not work. But if there was a solid state way of having an AC circuit with a superconductor then you could potentially create energy. This may be a dead end street though, now that I think about it, because of mechanical devices (Such as a free energy electric motor) need mechanical connections of different non-superconducting materials that also stick together, and the problem of lubricants(graphite might be best). And also there is no such thing yet of a superconducting AC circuit as far as I know at least.

Skin Effect

Is just an interesting and fun thing to think about, which is one of the laws of the universe that we live in, which will never change and which you can use to your advantage sometimes. Just knowing how the laws of the real universe work, is simple but profound and has so many fun implications. Just don't use these laws in a negative way against other humans.

See: Skin Effect Wiki

When a lightning bolt hits a metal cage and you are inside that metal cage (Also called a Faraday cage). The skin effect says that the flow of electricity will only travel along the outside of the cage, as long as it is an AC current or a short pulse of current. So that even if you were touching the inside of the cage you would not feel any of the energy from the lightning bolt, because of the skin effect, as long as the metal wasn't extremely thin. This is the reason why cars are so safe to be in during a thunder storm. And also they use this theory in the design of airplanes which is why they are so safe to be in during a thunderstorm also.

Another form of skin effect is fire (See: How Wild Fires Work). It only travels up hill and never down hill. So never be on top of a hill when there is a fire, you should always try to stay at the lowest and flattest point possible when making your escape, because fire travels uphill almost instantaneously but on flat surfaces it is very slow to spread in any direction. Also fire only burns at the very tip of an alcohol candles wick, which is good because otherwise the whole thing would catch on fire and explode if not for this effect of fire.
By the way when you see flames they are always the gas of the fuel being burned that is on fire.

Different flammable fuels catch fire at different temperatures. It takes a certain amount of heat energy to change any particular material into a gas, and even more heat energy to trigger the reaction with oxygen. The necessary heat level varies depending on the nature of the molecules that make up the fuel. A fuel's piloted ignition temperature is the heat level required to form a gas that will ignite when exposed to a spark. At the unpiloted ignition temperature, which is much higher, the fuel ignites without a spark.
The above quoted from howstuffworks.com

In other words solids and liquids or solids don't burn it is only the gases of that substance that burn. So even in wood the only way for there to be a flame is when the wood is so hot that it becomes a gas and then that gas is what burns, which we see as a flame. But when you see red hot coals, the wood is so hot that it doesn't even need air to keep on burning because it has such a high temperature that it will stay red hot without oxygen and has to cool down to below combustion temperature before it will go out even without oxygen. Which is the reason why if you pour water onto coals that they will go out, but if you put dirt over it then it won't go out. In other words the water doesn't starve the coal of oxygen, instead it conducts away the heat of the coals in order to cool them down into a low enough temperature to burn out.

Best Air Conditioner Invention

If you had solid state fan such as an ion fan (Web search under "solid state fan") Here's the Thorrn Micro Technologies site link.

And you had solid state cooling such as the a Bismuth telluride thermo couple, which utilizes the thermo electric effect.
Then if you attached a solar panel to those air conditioners you would have infinite cold air production.

This is the very best air conditioner that is possible with the current laws of physics. Because this is solid state and will never break down and can be made to any temperature. But it does have the one draw back of not being the most efficient form of cooling. Which is not a draw back if you attach a big enough solar panel to it.

LATER ADDED: The following quoted from wikipedia under "thermoelectric cooling":

Thermoelectric junctions are generally only around 5–10% as efficient as the ideal refrigerator (Carnot cycle), compared with 40–60% achieved by conventional compression cycle systems (reverse Rankine systems like a compressor). Due to the relatively low efficiency, thermoelectric cooling is generally only used in environments where the solid state nature (no moving parts, maintenance-free) outweighs pure efficiency.

But what I think about this is that I guess I just like the solid state nature of thermoelectric even if they use more energy. So as long as you have a large enough solar panel then you won't have to worry about the energy usage. And you also never have to recharge it with freon or have to worry about finding the hole that the freon is leaking from. And it makes absolutely no noise, which by the way anybody would appreciate having a more quiet house. Any rich person would prefer this technology because of it being so user friendly, and energy expenditure is meaningless to rich people.
Also it can be tuned to the temperature that you want most by only having a potentiometer(also called a variable resistor) and it has to be the right sized potentiometer to never be able to burn out the thermoelectric cooling plate. So you need the thermo electric module's specs for this reason.
And if you can find lots of cheap cooling plates, all you have to do is stack them for a compounded cooler end plate, with only the need for one ion fan. And less demand would be put on each individual plate, when combined.
Web search the phrase "Thermoelectric cooler" for products that you can buy. But be sure to only buy a product that comes with specs, so that you know all of the things that you can and cannot do with the device for maximum performance, without the device ever being able to burn out.

Wallington's Stonehenge

Wally Wallington
The “Wallington lever”
This is a good way to make your own megalithic stone structures to use as a house or just for fun.

Here are some links to the video and his site, and other info:
http://www.mlive.com/flintjournal/index.ssf/2008/02/local_mans_stonehenge_technolo.html
The above is a good video of the Wallington method in practice.
http://www.theforgottentechnology.com/
The above is his official website.
http://physicsbuzz.physicscentral.com/2007/11/instant-stonehenge-just-add-physics.html
The above is a short delve into the physics at work in large object moving method.
http://www.gizapyramid.com/wallington.htm
The above has some extra pictures not seen elsewhere.



He has pivot points but I don’t know how he gets the rock pivots under the large block especially as he’s still moving the block. Because I would assume that one person would have to tilt the large block to one side while he puts a pivot stone under the other side of the huge block.

Or maybe he puts the stones into the correct position in the middle of the 180 degree turn and while he’s placing the stone pivot where he wants it, the huge block is resting on the ground halfway into the turn, and then he completes the full 180 degree turn and rests the stone exactly on the new pivot point, as long as he has calculated the exact placement of the pivot stone for the notch in the big block to rest on perfectly. Therefore he just keeps reusing the same 2 pivot stones.

I need to also research cutting out stone. I think if you have a harder material used as a chisel against a rock that is a softer material, then you can cut the softer stone with that chisel. Or just use a metal chisel. Also you need a mallet and a wedge to cleave of large chunks of rock. After chipping out holes to put the wedge in. Rocks always want to fracture along there grain, or along weak points that have been artificially chiseled into them. In the same way as you make perforated paper. You drill holes along where you want it to fracture.

And I figured out how the stones in the pyramid and also Machu Picchu were so exactly placed together so that even a piece of paper won't fit between them. In Machu Picchu, their stones were of many different shapes and sizes even at crooked angles so I theorize their method was to fracture the stones off of an original stone outcrop like disassembling a puzzle, and then reassemble those pieces back into the way that they were taken out along their same fracture lines. But for the pyramids what they may have done is hammer the tops of the stones to flatten them out or may have even sanded them.

Obviously none of this requires alien technology to accomplish. I'm going to have to try it one day.

Absolute Certainty

Is everything or is nothing absolute?

• If you go 30 miles in one hour you could have either gone 30mph the whole time or 60 miles per hour for 5 minute and 20 mph the rest of the way and still gone the 30 miles in the 1 hour.
• Good and bad are not absolute as the old saying goes that gold is good for a human but bad for an ass(donkey). But straw is good for an ass but bad for a human. And how we punish people for being bad varies from country to country also.
• One substance can have different properties at different energy levels even though it is still the same substance. And when combining different substances at different energy levels there are infinite possibilities as to the properties that are desired. Also different densities and amounts of imperfections can give these same substances radically different properties.
• With so much not being absolute does that mean that death is still absolute?
• And is the act of saying nothing is absolute, absolute in and of itself.
  

Anything involving humans is never absolute and is never a certainty.

The only absolutes in civilization are “death and taxes” as the saying goes.

On the other hand nature and physical law is always an absolute certainty

Just look at nuclear physics experiments and what is at stake if they don’t work exactly as predicted, and how many lives are at stake. That’s how I know that god and spirits don’t interfere with things, because sometimes there’s no margin for error. This is why we rely on the laws of the universe to not change erratically.

Gravity will never fail. The sun will always shine, a knife will always cut, energy will never be created or destroyed, there will always be entropy which means there are always new beginnings from the past being erased by time.

We make tools out of nature in order to make survival more of a certainty and easier.

But then humans monopolize or franchise or corner the market in new tools to have control over other humans, who are forced to do whatever the rich guy tells them. This is a form of control which makes the rich person's life more certain but it makes every other humans life less certain.

If it wasn’t for this monopolizing of new ideas then we would have had infra red cook tops 20 years ago. Because it was patented but never used by the owner of the patent until the patent ran out and the rest of the world jumped on the opportunity of using the idea then, 20 years later.

Black Holes, And "In The Beginning"

Let us begin with some well accepted facts.

1. Information is lost inside a black hole(Called the Hawking Paradox). which means that the matter that was consumed by the black hole, is lost into nothingness, when the black hole dies, and disappears itself also.
2. We have a "theory" of the big bang but that, nor any other theory describes why the big bang happened, how it happened, or what happened before it in the first place. (In other words, what created the matter in the first place).
3. There are dwarf galaxies in the empty space between galaxies. Composed of mainly hydrogen.
   
4. These facts alone mean that anyone with any theory at all about the universe, could be the actual correct one, and know the real facts of the way the universe functions. Because no scientist can even tell you you're wrong when they have hardly any facts about space at all yet themselves. Scientists currently use alternate dimensions and imaginary particles(Tachyons, Axions) to make the math add up.
   
5. Supposedly we can see the big bang in all directions, by primitive protogalaxies being visible in all directions. Which is conveniently explained by the universe being 4-dimensional and it's therefore just an optical illusion.
   

So the conservation of energy says that energy can only be transformed, and cannot be created or destroyed. That in itself says that black holes can't destroy the information of matter when they disappear.
I propose that the matter in a black hole is transformed into energy in the same way as atomic bombs transform matter into energy. The evidence of this being, x-ray and UV emissions found coming out of the center of black holes. But beyond the insignificant size of photons there are even smaller particles which make up the space itself between stars. The evidence of fields of particles too small to see in any way, are electromagnetic fields, which are only lines of flux. But that tells you that there is a medium or a substance, that the flux is made up of.
It then follows that matter which is destroyed in black holes has to then be sprayed out into the interstellar medium as energy (x-rays, UV particles) and fractional particles smaller than energy(in other words the particles that space itself is made of). See: Einsteins general relativity.
And what happens when you fill the area between the galaxies with more space, in the same way as you would fill a balloon with air? You get an effect that can be mistaken as an "expanding universe". When it is in reality extra space being pumped between galaxies by black holes.
You may now ask me, that if the matter is turned into energy, then wouldn't all of the matter be eaten up over time and become a universe composed entirely of energy eventually? Well that's where my theory of how the universe began comes in.
------------------------------------------------------
When the universe began there was nothing except the smallest of smallest particles making up the limitless void of "only" space. But then those sub atomic particles began to clump together. From extreme cold making them extremely dense, movement was born into the universe because voids between particles were created as they condensed together. But when the medium of space is dense enough from the extreme cold, I believe that mathematically an atom of hydrogen must be created. Due to the extreme energy(space) density of absolute zero being the same energy density as is needed to create a particle of hydrogen(Otherwise described as the density of space itself becoming the same energy density as the equation e=mc²).
The above theory has noteworthy evidence behind it in that the large and small Magellanic Clouds which are located in the space between us and other galaxies, are composed primarily of hydrogen and helium, and no metals whatsoever. Which I predict were formed from the extreme cold between galaxies. Cold being a form of energy that at the highest energy density may create matter. Although I still concede that other forces may be at play as well in the interstellar medium that create energy density in the order of magnitude capable of forming basic particles.
Fact that I somewhat recall: Something like 70% of known space is permeated by free floating hydrogen.
Then after you are making free hydrogen from the super cold temperatures of inter stellar space you get charges that attract hydrogen atoms together. And then those charges become gravity, on the macro scale. Where even the like charges in objects(+/+) attract each other, only because of the size differential of the charges. Because if you have a large enough (+) charge it will attract any small (+) charge.
Then you have a sun which when it becomes super massive, will create new types of elements through fusion. And when the stars collect into a galaxy, the center becomes a super massive black hole. Which will then destroy all of the matter that was once created.
And the process begins all over again within the vast cold expanses between galaxies where protogalaxies(dwarf galaxies) are formed and expand. In a never ending cycle of the infinite universe.
=============
SIDE NOTE: It occurs to me that the cosmic background radiation could be caused by the gravity of our solar system, or previously stated as cold dense space, but in our solar system the solar wind protects us from any outside even more dangerous background radiation, the gravity of black holes creating x-ray and gamma ray spontaneous emission and the gravity inside of a planet creating infra red light spontaneously and stars creating visible and UV light. And as was mentioned, extreme cold and extreme electric charge(in other words gravity fields are the same) cause particles to coalesce from smallest particles to biggest particles, as the space gets colder and denser, and atoms and energy form out of space itself (I call it "spontaneous emission"). The order in which energy and particles are made from the warmest space(least dense space)- to coldest(most dense space), is as follows:

1. radio waves in somewhat least dense space
2. light waves in more dense space (space isn't dense enough in most of space until it's as dense as around Jupiter will it begin to emit infra red light).
   
3. gamma rays in even more dense space(suns)
4. and at the most dense space/or highest static electric charge/ or at the coldest temperatures- actual (+) charged atoms will be created

In reality it's probably a combination of cold /and charge/ that combine to form natural atoms in nature. So the right conditions would be needed, sort of in the same way as when freeze drying the pressure needs to be low before freeze drying will be possible.
Also when you have a large static electric field all of the above effects will occur in that static field in the same order. Which is what you see with UFO's technology normally, is the high charges will emit light and at even higher charges will emit deadly radiation.
So I theorize that when people describe the insides of UFO's, and there is ambient light that comes from all directions, it's just electric charge emitting photons. And also why lightning bolts emit light.
It's all because of the static electric charge(which has the same physical characteristics as gravity). And cold that cause all of the forces that make atoms and energy out of nothingness. Hypothetically.

Time Tempered Materials

Just have a highly charged (-/+) static field that you heat up a material in and then cool it in and when cooled it will either have a faster/ or slower rate of time relative to the outside world. Based on the amount of the charge when heating and cooling, and the polarity of the charge. Because some people theorize that the negative charge of electrons and antimatter are a sign of those particles moving backwards in time. Relative to the forward movement through time of positively charged particles. Just the chemistry of different uses of the element barium will show the effects of strange material properties(search: wiki). Even when not yet boosted with an outside electromagnetic field.

I site the July 29th 2008 press release of EEStor, the energy storage unit partner of Zenn motor co. This gotten off of wiki, which may or may not have been edited yet, and therefor may or may not be totally correct:
In addition, the July 29, 2008 press release^[26] states that the plastic matrix allows for better crystal polarization and that this "along with other proprietary processing steps provides the potential of a polarization saturation voltage required by EEStor, Inc." Polarization by a strong electric field is done in the final steps of manufacturing so that the material will form domains that are oriented in the proper direction for the best permittivity and energy storage. The world patent states this is done at 180 C with 4000 V.

The patent for EESU is under google patent search EESU