My new theories are that spontaneous emission is how lasers work, and photons have zero entropy, and electrons must also retain the speed of light, and spontaneous emission is free energy.
Well known fact: Lasers create free light energy.
Light may have infinite energy but at least has absolutely zero loss of energy. Einstein noticed that the speed of light never changes and that only time can change which means that when light slows down in certain substances it will speed up again as it leaves that substance. Also as light passes a high gravitational field and slows down it will then speed up again as it leaves that high gravitational field.
Another related theory is that electrons have the same constant speed that photons do. So when utilising the thermo electric effect of passing through 2 differing metals, the temperature decreases on one side of the junction because the electrons speed up at that junction and therefore time has to change and cooling is a side effect.
With light as the energy source for a laser, the light will act like a pump while lasing. As the atomic energy level rises each time a photon passes by the atom, the atom will emit more light at that new higher energy state. This is lasing, or as I call it spontaneous emission. One of two things may be happening here. Either the spontaneous emission happens continuously creating free energy, as long as any atom retains a high electric charge state. A test of this would be a high static field in a superconductor, emitting light with no loss of electrical charge. Or conservation of energy would probably say that as a photon is created then the electric charge will decrease. But in the end it may be that photons actually are created for free, which is just as far fetched as how photons have zero loss of energy anyway. In the end, what are you creating? An oscillation or a particle?
The reason why the visible light of a statically charged object isn't hot, and the inside of a star is so hot, is because it is extremely dense visible light in a star. And a side note is that the light energy just excites the atoms into being even hotter. And the vibration of the heat in the atoms makes an oscillating charge between the atoms and electrons which produces even more light as it oscillates between higher and lower atomic charge density.
A fun thought is that if you were in the center of the sun somehow, you would be able to see the brightest light ever in all directions, if you weren't blinded and burnt to a crisp.
How has our planet had a hot core for billions of years while never slowing down at all in core temperatures. Is this just no loss of energy like super conductors but translated to planetary core temperatures, or in other words planets just naturally have no entropy because they are a closed system and somehow the infra red radiation isn't fully emitted into space or that the sun adds any lost energy. This would be a tough balancing act to get to work to make a habitable planet, especially for planets further from the sun that do emit tons of infra red radiation, such as jupiter. Or is it true that spontaneous emission counter acts any entropy that could ever occur. I still know that it will be proven that Venus has an active core still, by virtue of it being the same size as earth alone.
In essence, my new theories just affirm my previous theory.
No comments:
Post a Comment