How to control Gravity

If somebody told you something that nobody else on the planet knew, would you notice?

Electricity has never been shown to have any effect on gravity, or time. Neither static electric field nor electromagnetism effect gravity. Those both involve virtual particles while Gravity was described by Einstein in general relativity, to be just a warp in the fabric of space time. Neither conductive metal nor ferrous material can block gravity or a gravity wave. No shock wave can create gravitational effects because there is no motion when a gravitational wave passes by. Even though gravity waves travel at the speed of light they do not induce motion when they pass. But a high speed object can induce gravity waves and time dilation like an electron induces magnetic waves in a wire.

Space time can be imagined by the following thought experiment. If you had 2 synchronized grandfather clocks. One submerged in water and the other on dry land in the open air. The grandfather clock under water would have the pendulum move slower than the clock on dry land where the pendulum would move freely in the air. The time on the clock under water would appear to move slower than the one on dry land. In the same way more dense space around a high gravity field will make time move slower. And in less dense space where there is no gravity in the intergalactic medium the time would move faster. So space time is full of differing densities of quanta or virtual particles that effect our perception of time and space.

So how do you create a gravity wave? You could either have an extremely massive but asymmetrical object spinning fast which would generate gravity waves. This is seen in nature in pulsars, quasars, neutron stars, black holes and of course super novas. A space ship with this inside of it would be hard to achieve though. Or as in an Einstein thought experiment, "what would happen if the sun suddenly disappeared?"(This is possible by the way if you had enough antimatter) You would have a gravity wave that would take 8 minutes to reach earth. So if you create or destroy matter you will create a gravity wave.

How do you create and destroy matter? Create antimatter and destroy it with regular matter.

Create Antimatter the same way that Jupiter does with an extremely large magnetic field. Highly charged particle collisions. Hypothetically have a ship with an extremely strong magnetic field around it, powered by a nuclear reactor. Then when the solar wind hits it, The charged particle collisions will randomly create antimatter. Then use the antihydrogen to destroy regular hydrogen and you will have created gravity waves and also you'd have immense electrical energy if you utilized the heat from the matter antimatter explosions. The faster you repeat this process the higher the gravity wave frequency. That is all hypothetical and may not work right.

Another hypothetical situation is if you had a brick of element 115 and bombarded it with protons to create element 116 which would then decay back into element 115. But while it decays what would it emit? Radiation? Or would it be a bigger particle like antimatter since it would emit so much radiation it might all come out at once as a bigger particle. They do say that this element emits alpha particles upon decay, maybe an isotope would emit antimatter? They're still researching element 115 and have more tests planned for this year. Then you can annihilate hydrogen with the antimatter. This would create heat, radiation, and gravity waves. You may be able to overcome the speed of decay by increating the speed of bombardment with protons or neutrons. Or you may need to slow down the passage of time to keep it from decaying. This would be possible if it were in a intense low or high gravity field. Sort of like which came first the gravity waves or the element that creates the gravity waves.

How do we create element 115? One way is to create it with fusion between 2 elements inside of an atomic explosion. Another way is to fuse it inside of a fusion reactor if at all possible.

Most of the above is hypothetical except for the fact that creating and destroying matter and antimatter will create gravity waves, then you only have to control and direct it. I don't know how you would direct a gravity wave though, since they don't interact with any form of matter. Maybe have multiple sources of waves and have complimentary and destructive wave fronts in the places you want them.

In the end all of these things have extreme power and are extremely dangerous in every way imaginable. No human should wield this power. You need control or predictability over any being who uses this kind of power.

What's it called when the sun never attends church on Sundays? Coronal mass rejection.

Secrets of the universe

Conservation of energy: Total amount of energy in an isolated system remains constant over time. You cannot create or destroy energy but entropy does destroy...

Entropy:The second law of thermodynamics is an expression of the finding that over time, differences in temperature, pressure, and chemical potential tend to equilibrate in an isolated physical system. It explains the phenomenon of irreversibility in nature.

Both cannot exist at the same time! In reality conservation of energy should say: The net sum of the universe is 0.0 over time. And -1(+)+1 is the total amount of energy which equals 0.0???
----------------------------------------
Time on earth when compared to time on a GPS satellite flows at a separate rate. Is time real?

Matter is all only energy, E = mc² . Is matter real?

Energy when combined with an equal and opposite charge of energy cancels out into nothing(Photons are virtual particles which live for a short time off of borrowed energy) mathematically the potential energy is gone, and so are the particles. And electric and magnetic lines of force appear and disappear as well. Heat death of the universe has been theorized to be the end of the universe based on energies canceling each other out. So how was the first potential created out of nothingness? Is everything made of nothingness?

But where you can destroy matter you can also create matter. Antiparticles are created everywhere in the universe where high-energy particle collisions take place. Like in Jupiter's magnetic field right now. Energy may also be created out of nothing. Transformers, optical amplifiers, lasers. This is in theory extra energy although entropy makes it impossible to use for useful work in a machine.

Virtual particles: The energy carried from one winding of a transformer to another, in quantum terms, is carried by virtual photons, not real photons.
-----------------------------------------------
Just as stars have spontaneously emission of every spectrum of radiation, and planets emit infra red radiation why can't any source of static electric fields, or magnetic energy fields, or even gravity fields themselves throughout space emit microwave radiation? Wait a minute lets look at outer space on wikipedia, it says "space" has hydrogen plasma, electromagnetic radiation, and magnetic fields and differences in gravity, wow all of the above! If this is true then the whole evidence for the big bang being background microwave radiation is false, and at the very least is an assumption, and the universe may not have had a real beginning, or end. Which is called the steady state theory invented in the 40's. Other evidence for the big bang is an imaginary 4th dimension that is causing us to expand on the outside of a balloon. Which could also be explained by black holes jetting out virtual particles back into the intergalactic medium, causing expansion between galaxies, just another optical illusion, while new galaxies are being formed all the time which are called protogalaxies made entirely of hydrogen created by high energy particle collisions. Is this any harder to believe than an imaginary balloon, or dark matter, and wimps and machos, and that we're all just made out of vibrating strings??? Well that's what leading physicists contend.
----------------------------------------------
Dark matter: Our galaxies are spinning too fast!!! Just look to the above example of time moving at a different pace between the earth and it's GPS satellites, now replace in your mind the outside edge of the galaxy with GPS satellites. By the way less gravity also may effect time, oh wait a second, looky here I just happened to find another article proving this exact thing called gravitational time dilation! An example of scientists seeing another optical illusion and making assumptions.
----------------------------------------------
Atheist bumper sticker idea: The universe is all just a mathematical equation. Do you think math gives a crap whether you live or die.
-----------------------------------------------
I just was thinking after writing this why if this is actual reality that we have people researching the wrong things. Well if you tell a lie enough it becomes reality! The scientists only get funding for what the government will fund and the government only funds certain things. So we have lots of money going to pseudoscience and no money going towards actual science.

They obviously don't want us in space. Why? Who knows? We can go to the moon and beyond in an instant with modern technology and off the shelf components. Do you know how much of the population are space enthusiasts??? But 100% of our leaders are against space??? Remember Bush saying to the moon mars and beyond? Well the fine print was withing 30 years. Which was all part of the plan because the next president could cancel it all when he got elected in 4 years. So why is it that you can reverse the space decision a president makes but after Nixon did crooked things and got kicked out, nothing he ever did was ever reversed? Duped again by the lying, cheating, and stealing politicians. Constellation canceled.

Nasa Engineers proposed a new rocket that could go to the moon and even work better than the shuttle out of off the shelf parts but The higher ups rejected it for a more expensive new research and development program which was then canceled by Obama. Cheaper faster better rocket rejected for bureaucracy.

Submarines in space should be the new mission. Build a moon base that manufactures reactors for space ships. The space ships designed like submarines. Then get to Jupiter and mine antimatter, then go anywhere with infinite power. This will never happen unless we get rid of every single politician in America, and replace them with the people who care and who do all of the actual work. Business owners, engineers, real scientists, visionaries, doers not talkers. Which will never happen ever.

Scientific method

The scientific method is as follows, in summary, in sequence of the process.

1. Observation
2. Hypothesis
3. Prediction
4. Test

Example:

1. The sun seems to rise a lot in the mornings.
2. I hypothesize that the sun rises every morning.
3. I predict it will rise tomorrow morning.
4. Your prediction is proven the next morning when you test to see if the sun actually comes up.

Also these results have to be reproducible by other scientists, which is why ghosts have not been proven to exist yet.

Spontaneous Emission is Free Energy

In my previous theory: Spontaneous emission is my theory of how LED's work and explains cosmic background radiation, and how the insides of planets are always hot when big enough. And how stars produce visible light as spontaneous emission that is so hot that it has a side effect of fusion of hydrogen into helium.

My new theories are that spontaneous emission is how lasers work, and photons have zero entropy, and electrons must also retain the speed of light, and spontaneous emission is free energy.

Well known fact: Lasers create free light energy.

Light may have infinite energy but at least has absolutely zero loss of energy. Einstein noticed that the speed of light never changes and that only time can change which means that when light slows down in certain substances it will speed up again as it leaves that substance. Also as light passes a high gravitational field and slows down it will then speed up again as it leaves that high gravitational field.

Another related theory is that electrons have the same constant speed that photons do. So when utilising the thermo electric effect of passing through 2 differing metals, the temperature decreases on one side of the junction because the electrons speed up at that junction and therefore time has to change and cooling is a side effect.

With light as the energy source for a laser, the light will act like a pump while lasing. As the atomic energy level rises each time a photon passes by the atom, the atom will emit more light at that new higher energy state. This is lasing, or as I call it spontaneous emission. One of two things may be happening here. Either the spontaneous emission happens continuously creating free energy, as long as any atom retains a high electric charge state. A test of this would be a high static field in a superconductor, emitting light with no loss of electrical charge. Or conservation of energy would probably say that as a photon is created then the electric charge will decrease. But in the end it may be that photons actually are created for free, which is just as far fetched as how photons have zero loss of energy anyway. In the end, what are you creating? An oscillation or a particle?
The reason why the visible light of a statically charged object isn't hot, and the inside of a star is so hot, is because it is extremely dense visible light in a star. And a side note is that the light energy just excites the atoms into being even hotter. And the vibration of the heat in the atoms makes an oscillating charge between the atoms and electrons which produces even more light as it oscillates between higher and lower atomic charge density.
A fun thought is that if you were in the center of the sun somehow, you would be able to see the brightest light ever in all directions, if you weren't blinded and burnt to a crisp.
How has our planet had a hot core for billions of years while never slowing down at all in core temperatures. Is this just no loss of energy like super conductors but translated to planetary core temperatures, or in other words planets just naturally have no entropy because they are a closed system and somehow the infra red radiation isn't fully emitted into space or that the sun adds any lost energy. This would be a tough balancing act to get to work to make a habitable planet, especially for planets further from the sun that do emit tons of infra red radiation, such as jupiter. Or is it true that spontaneous emission counter acts any entropy that could ever occur. I still know that it will be proven that Venus has an active core still, by virtue of it being the same size as earth alone.
In essence, my new theories just affirm my previous theory.

Antimatter

Known reactions that create antimatter: There are none yet, except for particle accelerators.
There are some theories though, and I will post them as I find them.
The best reaction would be a one step reaction. Find a material and mix it with another material in the perfect environement and it will make large quantities of antimatter. That is the ideal circumstance.
It's not very far fetched to imagine this when there are fusion reactions that transform particles into different particles, and that there are chemical endothermic reactions and exothermic reactions. Looking at the real properties of barium titanate makes you question what can and cannot be done theses days also.

One theory has to do with the material known as helium 3 that we can acquire on the moon, but if we used that for a stable fusion reaction and put lots of money into fusion research then we may well find new reactions that have byproducts which include antimatter.

The current way of making antimatter is to accelerate electrons until they collide and create a new negatively charged anti-hydrogen atom. But there may be other more efficient and predictable methods that we may find in the future that can be scaled to mass produce antimatter. As long an fusion energy works and gets funding for new nuclear physics experiments beyond fusion.

Antimatter occurs naturally in the van allen belts of earth and also at gas giants like jupiter. See: "antimatter" on wiki under "cost".And if we can somehow find a way to store the antimatter(encapsulated in neutrons) and use it, then we may have free energy if the antimatter can be reused based only on its "potential energy" which has reverse effects in the physical universe making new electrical and particle aplications and experimants possible with this new material of totally alien properties. See: "magic rectangle"

Also see my other antimatter post.
And "The final revolution is...".

And The Universe Says...

Listen to the universe, and let it be your guide, and it can never lie to you or malfunction or be incorrect. Humans always have the potential to be wrong or corrupt, though. Like the legend of steel in the first Conan movie. The one thing that you can always trust and count on is your sword, or I say, the universe in general.

If the universe disagrees with you then that means you have to change your approach to life. And if someone says to you “Hey you can’t do things that way” just reply “Well the universe tends to disagree with you.”

• When you have a device break, then the universe is saying that you designed it wrong and that‘s why it broke. Or when the device is obsolete, then the universe is saying that you made the entire device wrong to begin with. A well designed device should last longer than you will live to be, because the human body is already a device that lasts that long. No upgrades should be needed if it’s was ever a well designed device to begin with.
• When you have to make more inventions just to make an old invention work, like for cars to work you need to invent roads, and you have to pay more for extra inventions and it breaks more from more moving parts. The universe says, go with a better technology that performs the same function, like helicopters instead of cars. Also bicycles need a pump and tires and chains and roads. Vehicles are only for going long distances away from home anyway, so maybe you don't need them except for emergencies, if you like your home.
• If you can burn music and give copies to people for free, and you can make cheap knock offs for free, the universe is saying that information has no value in the real universe, if it can be copied for free. Selling information is what the media industry is. So why is information monopolized, or kept secret from others anyway?
• The universe works on the honor system, as if it’s natural to think that nobody would ever possibly need to do anything bad to other people. So there’s no rule in the universe about killing, or being punished for doing anything bad. As if telling you that there’s no point to killing or hurting other people in the real world. And if you know what you’re doing, there’s no reason to ever have bad in your life at all. Killing people is only a human invention, and if you're by yourself, the universe's honor system rule works perfectly.
  
• If houses cost 500,000$ and need constant upkeep and updating, then maybe you should have designed the house differently. The universe is saying that you’re throwing your efforts and money down the drain, when the house is outdated in 10 years, and also requires constant maintenance. Everything is makeshift when it comes to houses these days to either save money or be like everybody else. Why not be different and design a house well for once, so that it doesn't need upkeep. See: R-value in Alaska post.
  
• Rules are a human invention, and therefore have to be enforced by humans, because the universe won’t enforce the human made rules(value of things, taxes, killing is wrong, except genocide of animals is fine). I’d rather listen to the universe's rules than to human's rules. In fact just listening to the universe in general is better that to humans. The universe is never wrong or lies, but humans always have the potential to be wrong or lie. Rules are just a way of people having control over other people, and the universe never controls humans, we control the universe, utilizing knowledge. Also the universe is impartial, for no fear of any hidden agenda, or ulterior motives, or judging you for anything.
  
• Money only exists to be stolen. If everybody you traded with was family then you wouldn’t need currency but instead just share, based on equal effort of work days. The universe says that if you put value on things, then it will have value worth stealing. The universe is showing you this by how things keep getting stolen, and how sometimes people get hurt just so that a criminal can steal something of value.
  
• The same is true for drugs, the universe shows that it has no rule against using drugs on yourself. It is only when we made a rule that it was wrong to take drugs that criminals started making money at it and we suddenly had the highest public crime rate in history, all because it was made illegal by humans. Also the facts that are shown to you through case studies about drugs, are the real world trying to tell you not to take them, because of the addictive consequences. If only those drug addicts had listened to reality, they would never have become chronically addicted. The same is true but in a less severe way, about caffeine and coffee addiction.
  
• You shouldn’t have to work more than animals in order to make a living, unless you are genetically inferior to animals(sweat glands, eat too much, need house heating, need to cook food, and make tools.). Giraffes are the perfect example of living the perfect life without any worries or work. So the universe is telling us “that’s who you have to beat, when it comes to lifestyle.”
• Risk reward, is a good way of making some decisions. The less liability you have in life, if any at all, the better. Liability is risk, or when something is liable to happen eventually. You should live a life with maximum reward and minimal risk. This is the universe rewarding you for being smart, and using statistics, and averages, and facts.
• The government of America is the best one ever invented, but the truth of the matter is that it’s not the best working government possible. This is shown by congress constantly having to struggle to make new rules all of the time. As if people are constantly trying to fix our system. And the universe is saying “you shouldn’t have to keep fixing something if it already works.” maybe we need a government that has no rules and no money and no power, because that’s the way that the actual universe functions. As long as we can research a way to make this new type of civilization work. It's bad enough that our banking system is based on faith and any political office election is based on faith that that person tells the truth. Without faith our entire system will inevitably fail, one day.
  
• The best design is one that allows for an imperfect or chaotic universe. Not a design that requires perfection, all of the time, in order to function properly. An example is when designing a sidewalk, you lay concrete in sections or separate slabs, for expansion and contraction in the elements, so that the concrete never cracks. The universe hinting at the reasons behind it cracking all the of the time before, in previous improper designs.
  

So all in all, ignoring the universe, and facts, only leads to pain and suffering, but listening to the universe, and reality, always only leads to happiness. Also design things based on facts, and reality will show that it lasts forever, and you won’t have to maintain it, or replace it, or change it. Live with the universe not against it. Live within reality, not outside, in magic land. Don’t ever listen to the majority without questioning it. The majority said that there was no housing bubble, also the majority said “buy and hold” right before the “.com” bubble.

In order for good or bad to exist humans have to create it. Examples of good things: GPS, glasses, medical, free to run electric car(since we already have roads), solid state devices, computer‘s, and computer search engine, hunting rifles, good tasting food, the list goes on and on. Examples of bad things: arguing, stealing, killing, sadness.

So it’s a choice between creating your own good in your life or your own bad in your life. People may only choose to have a bad life because of illogical emotions and no research into improving their own life, or alternately just letting other people make decisions for them. Never listen to people(either an elected official, or the majority consensus), unless actual facts confirm what they say, only listen to reality, and the subtle messages of the universe. The universe says that making intelligent decisions based on obvious facts, is the only pathway to have a good lifestyle.

And religion actually has no useful answers to life in the end, and what the universe would say about religion is “why would you need a religion to tell you how to live your life, when you have the laws of physics to do that for you already.”

The true virtue of a person is only human opinion.

Now if only, one day, we could see beyond our own debilitating and primitive human psychology.