Sunday, August 16, 2009

Cancer Cure Kept Secret

In the video called "Run from the cure" found on youtube. It shows you how to make your own cure for cancer for free. This man behind the cancer cure must be telling the truth because he has nothing to gain by saying these things. He gives away his medicine for free, and also he gives people the video for free. And he has testimony from many people that they were cured, as long as there is a verifiable before and after evidence to back up the testimony. Supposedly it can also cure alzimers because of neurogenisis and neuroprotective effects, and schizophenia because it's a depressent.

What is it that is so bad about hemp?
Does it kill people? Maybe if smoked, not when ingested as hemp oil. They say the smoking is worse on health than cigarettes, but so are cigars and those are legal. And wiki under THC says this"There has never been a documented human fatality from overdosing on tetrahydrocannabinol or cannabis"
Is it addictive? (wikipedia under cannabis says this: "The minimum amount of THC required to have a perceptible psychoactive effect is about 10 micrograms per kilogram of body weight") Maybe it is addictive in high doses, but so are pain killers, and those are legal to have. If you are dependent on it there's no drawback either because you just grow more for free.
Are there any short term, or long term side effects? See: Positive and negative side effects under THC. The prescription drug alternatives have much worse side effects as cancer drugs.
I'd say the worse drug in addictive qualities and dangerous side effects would have to be tobacco.

Other useful qualities of hemp are to make paper or rope or cloth and more. Requires no herbicide and little pesticide to grow and it grows extremely fast. Hemp seeds are edible and have all esential vitamins and minerals and nutients. And if you made hemp sand bags you could construct sand bag structures.
The variety of uses of hemp rival that of the coconut.

The only excuse that the gov uses to enforce the non use of marajuana is the "gateway drug hypothesis". But if you read this hypothesis it says you somehow lose common sense and go into worse drugs. Or that you have friends that are into worse drugs. Which may be true if you kept Hemp illegal like all the other drugs. In the end it would only increase the probability of using harder drugs. But you're also decreasing the probability of using it to save lives from cancer.

Maybe it's true that the government and the world is hiding the truth to protect their sources of money and control. And why did all countries outlaw it at the same time? Well it had something to do with the Geneva conventions and how it because international law. Read about it here. So who are the power players that coerced every nation into this agreement? That's something to be solved another day.

In the end it's a "victimless crime" the same as prostitution or any other supposed ethical law. And if I were to make a constitution of my own it would have in it "no victimless crimes" because you can never go back once it's outlawed.

What if drugs were legalized? They say, "more people would use the drugs if it were legal". But ask anyone if they would use drugs if it were legal and they'd say "no"! And ask them if they know anyone that would use drugs if they were legal, and they'd still say "no"! The fact is that the only people that would use drugs if they were legal would be people that already are using drugs or that are predisposed genetically to try drugs.

In the end drugs will never be legalized even if it would cure crime, because all the police and investigators would be out of work and the prisons would be empty and there would be no court cases and all of the drug dealers would need to do something else to make money. So even though they call it "the war on drugs", nobody is really trying to win the war because it would cause maybe 25% unemployment if that ever happened and all hell would break loose. So in the end the world never changes and you should just start your own society if at all possible because this one will never change.

The lawmakers justify all of these victimless crimes with the "American puritanical ethic" or APE. Anything that feels good is a sin and therefore should be against the law, like the bible says. Just read "The rape of the APE". But the actual reasons are separate from the justification that they'll tell you. The actual reason being control and the unemployment if the laws were repealed. Hopefully they won't outlaw peanut butter or sex any time soon just because people like those also. If they do I'm out of here, and I know lots of people that are with me on that one.

Here's info on hemp
Also see: Madagascar Periwinkle for another possible cancer cure that may or may not be poisonous. Ask the natives that use it for first hand knowledge.
Also see: Apricot kernels
Also see: chlorella
Also see: ginseng
Also see: Siberian ginseng who knows why it's illegal too.
Also see: devils club
Also see my article on "Miracle Mineral Supplement" for more almost verifiable cures that they don't want you to know about.
Also see the marihuana tax act of 1937 for how it was outlawed.

No comments: