Controlling gravity scientific paper

Introduction:
This paper is meant to show that we can create artificial gravity waves with the possibility of different frequencies being achieved also. Gravity waves could one day be used to effect space and time in our future. The hypothesis is that combining antihydrogen with hydrogen will produce an explosion from cancellation of both particles with a byproduct of radiation and gravity waves.

research Euclidean geometry, Cartesian coordinates, Newtonian mechanics, high level math, Lorentz transformation,

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Gravity Defined

Understanding how to control gravity is understanding how to control time and space. We have seen in experimentation that one force has little or no impact on another force. Electrostatic fields can be blocked by conductive metals, while electromagnetic fields can be blocked by ferros metals such as iron though both have very different inductive properties as well. Neither Conductive metal nor ferros metal can interfere with the permiation of gravity though. So gravity is also a unique force. There may even be more as of yet unknown forces that I have not mentioned above. Gravity is a unique force which Einstein described in his theory of general relativity as "Space time" This can be summarized with a simple analogy as well. Current theories to describe asymmetries we see in nature from the outer edges of galaxies moving too fast, are postulated to be caused by "dark matter". But those same asymmetries can be elegantly described by another well known phenomena as well.

Space time

Space and Time as described by Einstein in his theory of general relativity, are hard for people to put together as being part of the same phenomena, or hard to grasp. But it can be easily imagined in a simple thought experiment.

Lets say you have 2 synchronized grandfather clocks. One submerged in water and the other on dry land in the open air. The grandfather clock under water would have a slower moving pendulum due to the obvious friction from the more dense water interfering with the motion of the pendulum. But the pendulum on dry land would work faster from less friction of the less dense air that the pendulum swung through. This difference in motion would have a side effect of an apparent difference in the passage of time as seen between both clock upon inspection, after both were put back beside each other on dry land again after the experiment was completed.
This is not a real difference in the passage of time but an analogy of the same theory. In the same way, the lower the gravitational potential (closer to the center of a massive object. Like on a very massive planet), the more slowly time passes.(See: Gravitational time dilation). It's also true through actual experimentation (See:) that in comparison the further you are from a center of mass, (or the higher the gravitational potential. Like in the intergalactic medium) the faster time passes.

The fabric of space is inseparable from time because as space is stretched and becomes more dense near a massive object, the movement is impeded by the density of the quanta of the fabric of space. Theoretically the quanta that space is made of are subatomic virtual particles. Magnetic lines of force have their own set of subatomic virtual particles that can only be explained mathematically, have unique properties, and can never be seen. Static electric fields have lines of force that have their own set of subatomic virtual particles that can only be explained mathematically, have unique properties, and can never be seen. But also space time itself has it's own set of quanta or virtual particles that can only be explained mathematically at this time, which have their own unique properties, and can also never be seen.


Let us call the quanta or virtual particles that comprise space, "gravity" in this example since there is no better term yet. It has been called ether but that term is not as readily acknowledged.
As for time we will call that T.

And since this is a zero sum universe as described by the law of conservation of energy(See: conservation of energy). I will Describe space as being the isolated system in this example as described by the conservation of energy isolated system. This isolated system will be a cubical section of space of your choosing. This isolated system of space is comprised of 2 energies that are interchangeable and can be transformed from one into the other. The energies being transformed in a closed system of space are "Gravity" and "time".

More specifically the higher the density of gravity, the lower the rate of time. But in comparison the lower the density of gravity the higher the rate of time.

Space, S, being the sum total of the closed system,

Gravity, G, being the density of space,

And Time, T, being the rate of time, as written

S=G/T
Space=Gravity density/time rate

This equation can also be written:

S(G)=T
or
S(T)=G

Using this simple equation or new law I have just described can be proven in testing. With this new theory you can predict the movements of celestial bodies by factoring in not only gravity but time dilation as well. Which current physics does not consider in any calculations. I site "dark matter theory". This theory is based on calculations made about galaxies that only involve apparent speed of galactic outer circumfrance rotations as compared to apparent predicted mass of the galaxy itself. Causing the obvious illusion that the galaxies are spinning too fast. I propose that this phenomena is easily and elegantly explained by Time dilation which we currently can not measure.

A good unit of measurement That has worked so far in history is the speed of light since the speed of light never changes. But when the light is curved by gravity it will take longer to reach somewhere than a straight line would. Which should always be factored into calculations. Also since light travels at

299 792 458 m / s

You have to be certain that due to the curvature of space time that you are measuring the same relative size of meters and the same relative pace of time.


Another standard unit of measurement is how we have a control ounce for measuring weight and that ounce of metal is locked away in a vault to be sure of measurement accuracy for all scientist on earth. We also need a control clock or time, to measure time dilation. For the ounce of metal described, that same weight if it were on the moon could be used just as well to measure the weight of objects on the moon. But when it comes to clocks, the use of a clock on earth to measure time dilation would not be the same as using that same clock on the moon to measure time dilation. So the control must be one or the other. Earth is easier so earth time will be our control clock.

We have to also take into account any measurement of gravity density or time rate the effects of surrounding sources of gravity. Any orbiting objects will definitely effect the rate of time dilation dependent on how far they are from the clock at the time of measurement due to the inverse square law of gravity. This can be tested by having an atomic clocks time rate tested as the moon is directly overhead as compared to the time rate on earth tested by another synchronized atomic clock directly on the other side of the earth at the exact same time.



Solve for Gravity density method 1: Time elapsed from 1 ounce to fall 100 meters in vacuum. Meters/second squared. This may not work because as we all know gravity and time rate change the higher in potential from the center of mass you get.

Solve for Gravity density method 2: Use a highly accurate scale on the earth to measure the weight of an ounce of metal. Use the same scale and the same ounce to measure the weight on the moon.

As we know the moon has 1/6th the gravity of earth which these experiments should confirm.

Now we need to solve for the rate of time of earth as compared to the moon. Once we have this figure then we can estimate the actual S=G/T equation.

Solve for time method 1: Have an object in orbit with an atomic clock on it. Compare that time to a control atomic clock being the time on earth. Move that same object with a clock on it to a higher orbit. Now measure the time on orbiting object as compared with time on the planet. This has to be done in a uniform gravitational field to be free of any unknown time dilation. Which means preferably above a planet with no moons like venus. Preferably also on a planet that is not in the gravitational field of a sun which we currently do not have to test.

Solve for time method 2: We know that the relative gravity never changes on the moon, or on the earth so we can have an atomic clock on the moon and a control atomic clock on the earth and compare the rates of both clocks using a laser or radio to communicate the information.

Time on the moon, for the moment we will assume as an example that, it's just a tiny, almost imperceptible amount of time rate faster, because of the less gravity. So maybe earth time=1 unit per unit, moon time rate=1.1. Or, 1.1 moon time units/ 1 earth time units.

or
Time rate =1/1.1

This number could now become our new time rate unit of measurement.

Now with the given figures we can solve, in this example equation.

G(1/6) x T(1.1/1 second per second)= S (of the moon)

Also any time dilation caused by motion of a object will automatically cancel out because the faster an object goes the slower it's time rate goes but that does not interfere with perceived speed as viewed from an outside stationary location of an observer. But this can be used as a unit of measurement of time rate also. Assuming that the space the object is traveling through has only 1 uniform symmetrical gravitational field. We can extrapolate that if you were to reach the time rate difference speed time dilation alone in earths atmosphere as the gravitational time dilation difference of that between earth and the moon then you would be able to ascertain that at that speed you have the same gravitational field as the moon, in terms of time dilation effect.

meters/second time rate compared to earth time =(+/-)1.1/1

moon time compared to earth time=1.1/1










Given isolated system of space is Earth as opposed to moon.

This new equation is not finished. Because we now need standard unit of measurement time. And we also need a new standard unit of measurement of gravity.

This equation is an unmeasurable number.

I don't know why I even wrote this!

But in order to have a reference as too how much time or how much gravity there is in a section of space you have to have some way of measuring it. Which requires a control to measure it by.

You can assume you can measure time with a watch. But in two different gravity fields there is no control time to always know how fast or slow the rate of time is at another place. Once you actually can control gravity this will mean that all of a sudden clocks will all become inaccurate on any vehicle or home that uses controlled gravity.Time will become irrelevant and won't be able to be used as a standard measurement unless you're on a planet where the gravity field is symmetrical and you're just estimating, or you need to get to work, or you need to be at a meeting or an event.

If you were to measure gravity you would also get into trouble if you were on a vehicle that used controlled gravity.

Time dilation effecting the perceived motion of galaxies

Dark matter theory as understood at the current time leads to some obvious problems in testing. You cannot see it. It's weakly interacting with every aspect of our universe. We don't know any of it's properties other than gravitational effects. The only reason dark matter was postulated was to explain the rotation along the edge of galaxies to be too fast for the mass of the galaxy. But gravitational effects being the cause of the visual phenomena is itself an assumption.

Control waves with wave guide like microwave waveguide emitters.

No waste heat violating one of the laws of thermodynamics.

more efficient thermionic generator